AI Act · Article 27
What is a fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA)?
Article 27 sets out when a deployer must carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment and what it must cover.
Below is the provision itself, word for word, from the current consolidated version. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗
AI Act, Article 27(1) — Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
Prior to deploying a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), with the exception of high-risk AI systems intended to be used in the area listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are bodies governed by public law, or are private entities providing public services, and deployers of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 5 (b) and (c) of Annex III, shall perform an assessment of the impact on fundamental rights that the use of such system may produce. For that purpose, deployers shall perform an assessment consisting of: (a) a description of the deployer’s processes in which the high-risk AI system will be used in line with its intended purpose; (b) a description of the period of time within which, and the frequency with which, each high-risk AI system is intended to be used; (c) the categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected by its use in the specific context; (d) the specific risks of harm likely to have an impact on the categories of natural persons or groups of persons identified pursuant to point (c) of this paragraph, taking into account the information given by the provider pursuant to Article 13; (e) a description of the implementation of human oversight measures, according to the instructions for use; (f) the measures to be taken in the case of the materialisation of those risks, including the arrangements for internal governance and complaint mechanisms.
AI Act, Article 27(2) — Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
The obligation laid down in paragraph 1 applies to the first use of the high-risk AI system. The deployer may, in similar cases, rely on previously conducted fundamental rights impact assessments or existing impact assessments carried out by provider. If, during the use of the high-risk AI system, the deployer considers that any of the elements listed in paragraph 1 has changed or is no longer up to date, the deployer shall take the necessary steps to update the information.
AI Act, Article 27(3) — Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
Once the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has been performed, the deployer shall notify the market surveillance authority of its results, submitting the filled-out template referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article as part of the notification. In the case referred to in Article 46(1), deployers may be exempt from that obligation to notify.
AI Act, Article 27(4) — Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
If any of the obligations laid down in this Article is already met through the data protection impact assessment conducted pursuant to Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, the fundamental rights impact assessment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall complement that data protection impact assessment.
AI Act, Article 27(5) — Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
The AI Office shall develop a template for a questionnaire, including through an automated tool, to facilitate deployers in complying with their obligations under this Article in a simplified manner.
Your situation is not in the text. The provision above is the law; applying it to your case is the actual work. Ask this in the chat and you get the same verbatim provisions plus a plain-language reading, kept visibly separate. 7-day Pro trial, no card — and it is not legal advice.
Full article: AI Act, Article 27 · All of AI Act
Related questions
- What applies on 2 August 2026 under the AI Act?
- When do the AI Act’s high-risk classification rules apply?
- What are the penalties under the AI Act?
Not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic.