acquis · Law · Data Governance Act
Data Governance Act · CELEX 32022R0868
Article 34
Verbatim text of the current consolidated version · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗
Data Governance Act, Article 34(1) — Penalties
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the obligations regarding transfers of non-personal data to third countries pursuant to Article 5(14) and Article 31, the notification obligation of data intermediation services providers pursuant to Article 11, the conditions for providing data intermediation services pursuant to Article 12 and the conditions for the registration as a recognised data altruism organisation pursuant to Articles 18, 20, 21 and 22, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In their rules on penalties, Member States shall take into account the recommendations of the European Data Innovation Board. Member States shall, by 24 September 2023 , notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Data Governance Act, Article 34(2) — Penalties
Member States shall take into account the following non-exhaustive and indicative criteria for the imposition of penalties on data intermediation services providers and recognised data altruism organisations for infringements of this Regulation, where appropriate: (a) the nature, gravity, scale and duration of the infringement; (b) any action taken by the data intermediation services provider or recognised data altruism organisation to mitigate or remedy the damage caused by the infringement; (c) any previous infringements by the data intermediation services provider or recognised data altruism organisation; (d) the financial benefits gained or losses avoided by the data intermediation services provider or recognised data altruism organisation due to the infringement, insofar as such benefits or losses can be reliably established; (e) any other aggravating or mitigating factors applicable to the circumstances of the case.
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →
Other articles of the Data Governance Act
Art. 1Art. 2Art. 3Art. 4Art. 5Art. 6Art. 7Art. 8Art. 9Art. 10Art. 11Art. 12Art. 13Art. 14Art. 15Art. 16Art. 17Art. 18Art. 19Art. 20Art. 21Art. 22Art. 23Art. 24Art. 25Art. 26Art. 27Art. 28Art. 29Art. 30Art. 31Art. 32Art. 33Art. 34Art. 35Art. 36Art. 37Art. 38
Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage