AI Act · CELEX 32024R1689
Article 30
Verbatim text of the current consolidated version · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗
AI Act, Article 30(1) — Notification procedure
Notifying authorities may notify only conformity assessment bodies which have satisfied the requirements laid down in Article 31.
AI Act, Article 30(2) — Notification procedure
Notifying authorities shall notify the Commission and the other Member States, using the electronic notification tool developed and managed by the Commission, of each conformity assessment body referred to in paragraph 1.
AI Act, Article 30(3) — Notification procedure
The notification referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall include full details of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment module or modules, the types of AI systems concerned, and the relevant attestation of competence. Where a notification is not based on an accreditation certificate as referred to in Article 29(2), the notifying authority shall provide the Commission and the other Member States with documentary evidence which attests to the competence of the conformity assessment body and to the arrangements in place to ensure that that body will be monitored regularly and will continue to satisfy the requirements laid down in Article 31.
AI Act, Article 30(4) — Notification procedure
The conformity assessment body concerned may perform the activities of a notified body only where no objections are raised by the Commission or the other Member States within two weeks of a notification by a notifying authority where it includes an accreditation certificate referred to in Article 29(2), or within two months of a notification by the notifying authority where it includes documentary evidence referred to in Article 29(3).
AI Act, Article 30(5) — Notification procedure
Where objections are raised, the Commission shall, without delay, enter into consultations with the relevant Member States and the conformity assessment body. In view thereof, the Commission shall decide whether the authorisation is justified. The Commission shall address its decision to the Member State concerned and to the relevant conformity assessment body.
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →
Other articles of the AI Act
Art. 1Art. 2Art. 3Art. 4Art. 5Art. 6Art. 7Art. 8Art. 9Art. 10Art. 11Art. 12Art. 13Art. 14Art. 15Art. 16Art. 17Art. 18Art. 19Art. 20Art. 21Art. 22Art. 23Art. 24Art. 25Art. 26Art. 27Art. 28Art. 29Art. 30Art. 31Art. 32Art. 33Art. 34Art. 35Art. 36Art. 37Art. 38Art. 39Art. 40Art. 41Art. 42Art. 43Art. 44Art. 45Art. 46Art. 47Art. 48Art. 49Art. 50Art. 51Art. 52Art. 53Art. 54Art. 55Art. 56Art. 57Art. 58Art. 59Art. 60Art. 61Art. 62Art. 63Art. 64Art. 65Art. 66Art. 67Art. 68Art. 69Art. 70Art. 71Art. 72Art. 73Art. 74Art. 75Art. 76Art. 77Art. 78Art. 79Art. 80Art. 81Art. 82Art. 83Art. 84Art. 85Art. 86Art. 87Art. 88Art. 89Art. 90Art. 91Art. 92Art. 93Art. 94Art. 95Art. 96Art. 97Art. 98Art. 99Art. 100Art. 101Art. 102Art. 103Art. 104Art. 105Art. 106Art. 107Art. 108Art. 109Art. 110Art. 111Art. 112Art. 113
Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage