acquis · Law · AI Act

AI Act · CELEX 32024R1689

Article 34

Verbatim text of the current consolidated version · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗

AI Act, Article 34(1) — Operational obligations of notified bodies
Notified bodies shall verify the conformity of high-risk AI systems in accordance with the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43.
AI Act, Article 34(2) — Operational obligations of notified bodies
Notified bodies shall avoid unnecessary burdens for providers when performing their activities, and take due account of the size of the provider, the sector in which it operates, its structure and the degree of complexity of the high-risk AI system concerned, in particular in view of minimising administrative burdens and compliance costs for micro- and small enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC. The notified body shall, nevertheless, respect the degree of rigour and the level of protection required for the compliance of the high-risk AI system with the requirements of this Regulation.
AI Act, Article 34(3) — Operational obligations of notified bodies
Notified bodies shall make available and submit upon request all relevant documentation, including the providers’ documentation, to the notifying authority referred to in Article 28 to allow that authority to conduct its assessment, designation, notification and monitoring activities, and to facilitate the assessment outlined in this Section.
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →

Other articles of the AI Act

← Article 33 · Article 35

Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage