DORA · CELEX 32022R2554
Article 40
Verbatim text of the current consolidated version · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗
DORA, Article 40(1) — Ongoing oversight
When conducting oversight activities, in particular general investigations or inspections, the Lead Overseer shall be assisted by a joint examination team established for each critical ICT third-party service provider.
DORA, Article 40(2) — Ongoing oversight
The joint examination team referred to in paragraph 1 shall be composed of staff members from: (a) the ESAs; (b) the relevant competent authorities supervising the financial entities to which the critical ICT third-party service provider provides ICT services; (c) the national competent authority referred to in Article 32(4), point (e), on a voluntary basis; (d) one national competent authority from the Member State where the critical ICT third-party service provider is established, on a voluntary basis. Members of the joint examination team shall have expertise in ICT matters and in operational risk. The joint examination team shall work under the coordination of a designated Lead Overseer staff member (the ‘ Lead Overseer coordinator ’ ).
DORA, Article 40(3) — Ongoing oversight
Within 3 months of the completion of an investigation or inspection, the Lead Overseer, after consulting the Oversight Forum, shall adopt recommendations to be addressed to the critical ICT third-party service provider pursuant to the powers referred to in Article 35.
DORA, Article 40(4) — Ongoing oversight
The recommendations referred to in paragraph 3 shall be immediately communicated to the critical ICT third-party service provider and to the competent authorities of the financial entities to which it provides ICT services. For the purposes of fulfilling the oversight activities, the Lead Overseer may take into consideration any relevant third-party certifications and ICT third-party internal or external audit reports made available by the critical ICT third-party service provider.
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →
Other articles of the DORA
Art. 1Art. 2Art. 3Art. 4Art. 5Art. 6Art. 7Art. 8Art. 9Art. 10Art. 11Art. 12Art. 13Art. 14Art. 15Art. 16Art. 17Art. 18Art. 19Art. 20Art. 21Art. 22Art. 23Art. 24Art. 25Art. 26Art. 27Art. 28Art. 29Art. 30Art. 31Art. 32Art. 33Art. 34Art. 35Art. 36Art. 37Art. 38Art. 39Art. 40Art. 41Art. 42Art. 43Art. 44Art. 45Art. 46Art. 47Art. 48Art. 49Art. 50Art. 51Art. 52Art. 53Art. 54Art. 55Art. 56Art. 57Art. 58Art. 59Art. 60Art. 61Art. 62Art. 63Art. 64
Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage