acquis · Law · DORA

DORA · CELEX 32022R2554

Article 58

Verbatim text of the current consolidated version · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗

DORA, Article 58(1) — Review clause
By 17 January 2028, the Commission shall, after consulting the ESAs and the ESRB, as appropriate, carry out a review and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The review shall include at least the following:
DORA, Article 58(1)(a) — Review clause
the criteria for the designation of critical ICT third-party service providers in accordance with Article 31(2);
DORA, Article 58(1)(b) — Review clause
the voluntary nature of the notification of significant cyber threats referred to in Article 19;
DORA, Article 58(1)(c) — Review clause
the regime referred to in Article 31(12) and the powers of the Lead Overseer provided for in Article 35(1), point (d), point (iv), first indent, with a view to evaluating the effectiveness of those provisions with regard to ensuring effective oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers established in a third country, and the necessity to establish a subsidiary in the Union. For the purposes of the first subparagraph of this point, the review shall include an analysis of the regime referred to in Article 31(12), including in terms of access for Union financial entities to services from third countries and availability of such services on the Union market and it shall take into account further developments in the markets for the services covered by this Regulation, the practical experience of financial entities and financial supervisors with regard to the application and, respectively, supervision of that regime, and any relevant regulatory and supervisory developments taking place at international level.
DORA, Article 58(1)(d) — Review clause
the appropriateness of including in the scope of this Regulation financial entities referred to in Article 2(3), point (e), making use of automated sales systems, in light of future market developments on the use of such systems;
DORA, Article 58(1)(e) — Review clause
the functioning and effectiveness of the JON in supporting the consistency of the oversight and the efficiency of the exchange of information within the Oversight Framework.
DORA, Article 58(2) — Review clause
In the context of the review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, the Commission shall assess the need for increased cyber resilience of payment systems and payment-processing activities and the appropriateness of extending the scope of this Regulation to operators of payment systems and entities involved in payment-processing activities. In light of this assessment, the Commission shall submit, as part of the review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, a report to the European Parliament and the Council no later than 17 July 2023 . Based on that review report, and after consulting ESAs, ECB and the ESRB, the Commission may submit, where appropriate and as part of the legislative proposal that it may adopt pursuant to Article 108, second paragraph, of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, a proposal to ensure that all operators of payment systems and entities involved in payment-processing activities are subject to an appropriate oversight, while taking into account existing oversight by the central bank.
DORA, Article 58(3) — Review clause
By 17 January 2026 , the Commission shall, after consulting the ESAs and the Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies, carry out a review and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal, on the appropriateness of strengthened requirements for statutory auditors and audit firms as regards digital operational resilience, by means of the inclusion of statutory auditors and audit firms into the scope of this Regulation or by means of amendments to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council .
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →

Other articles of the DORA

← Article 57 · Article 59

Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage

DORA, Article 58 — full text, verified