MiCA · CELEX 02023R1114-20240109

Article 66

Verbatim text of the current consolidated version (consolidated 2024-01-09) · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗

MiCA, Article 66(1) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

Crypto-asset service providers shall act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their clients and prospective clients.

MiCA, Article 66(2) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

Crypto-asset service providers shall provide their clients with information that is fair, clear and not misleading, including in marketing communications, which shall be identified as such. Crypto-asset service providers shall not, deliberately or negligently, mislead a client in relation to the real or perceived advantages of any crypto-assets.

MiCA, Article 66(3) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

Crypto-asset service providers shall warn clients of the risks associated with transactions in crypto-assets. When operating a trading platform for crypto-assets, exchanging crypto-assets for funds or other crypto-assets, providing advice on crypto-assets or providing portfolio management on crypto-assets, crypto-asset service providers shall provide their clients with hyperlinks to any crypto-asset white papers for the crypto-assets in relation to which they are providing those services.

MiCA, Article 66(4) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

Crypto-asset service providers shall make their policies on pricing, costs and fees publicly available, in a prominent place on their website.

MiCA, Article 66(5) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

Crypto-asset service providers shall make publicly available, in a prominent place on their website, information related to the principal adverse impacts on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism used to issue each crypto-asset in relation to which they provide services. That information may be obtained from the crypto-asset white papers.

MiCA, Article 66(6) — Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients

ESMA, in cooperation with EBA, shall develop draft regulatory technical standards on the content, methodologies and presentation of information referred to in paragraph 5 in respect of the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impacts on the climate and other environment‐related adverse impacts. When developing the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall consider the various types of consensus mechanisms used to validate crypto-asset transactions, their incentive structures and the use of energy, renewable energy and natural resources, the production of waste and greenhouse gas emissions. ESMA shall update the regulatory technical standards in the light of regulatory and technological developments. ESMA shall submit the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by 30 June 2024 . Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →

Other articles of the MiCA

Art. 1 Art. 2 Art. 3 Art. 4 Art. 5 Art. 6 Art. 7 Art. 8 Art. 9 Art. 10 Art. 11 Art. 12 Art. 13 Art. 14 Art. 15 Art. 16 Art. 17 Art. 18 Art. 19 Art. 20 Art. 21 Art. 22 Art. 23 Art. 24 Art. 25 Art. 26 Art. 27 Art. 28 Art. 29 Art. 30 Art. 31 Art. 32 Art. 33 Art. 34 Art. 35 Art. 36 Art. 37 Art. 38 Art. 39 Art. 40 Art. 41 Art. 42 Art. 43 Art. 44 Art. 45 Art. 46 Art. 47 Art. 48 Art. 49 Art. 50 Art. 51 Art. 52 Art. 53 Art. 54 Art. 55 Art. 56 Art. 57 Art. 58 Art. 59 Art. 60 Art. 61 Art. 62 Art. 63 Art. 64 Art. 65 Art. 66 Art. 67 Art. 68 Art. 69 Art. 70 Art. 71 Art. 72 Art. 73 Art. 74 Art. 75 Art. 76 Art. 77 Art. 78 Art. 79 Art. 80 Art. 81 Art. 82 Art. 83 Art. 84 Art. 85 Art. 86 Art. 87 Art. 88 Art. 89 Art. 90 Art. 91 Art. 92 Art. 93 Art. 94 Art. 95 Art. 96 Art. 97 Art. 98 Art. 99 Art. 100 Art. 101 Art. 102 Art. 103 Art. 104 Art. 105 Art. 106 Art. 107 Art. 108 Art. 109 Art. 110 Art. 110a Art. 111 Art. 112 Art. 113 Art. 114 Art. 115 Art. 116 Art. 117 Art. 118 Art. 119 Art. 120 Art. 121 Art. 122 Art. 123 Art. 124 Art. 125 Art. 126 Art. 127 Art. 128 Art. 129 Art. 130 Art. 131 Art. 132 Art. 133 Art. 134 Art. 135 Art. 136 Art. 137 Art. 138 Art. 139 Art. 140 Art. 141 Art. 142 Art. 143 Art. 144 Art. 145 Art. 146 Art. 147 Art. 148 Art. 149

← Article 65 · Article 67 →

Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage