eIDAS 2 · CELEX 32024R1183
Article 32
Verbatim text of the current consolidated version (consolidated 2024-10-18) · status: in force. Check it on EUR-Lex ↗
eIDAS 2, Article 32(1) — Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic signatures
The process for the validation of a qualified electronic signature shall confirm the validity of a qualified electronic signature provided that: (a) the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I; (b) the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing; (c) the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party; (d) the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party; (e) the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing; (f) the electronic signature was created by a qualified electronic signature creation device; (g) the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised; (h) the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing. Compliance with the requirements laid down in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be presumed where the validation of qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 3.
eIDAS 2, Article 32(2) — Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic signatures
The system used for validating the qualified electronic signature shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
eIDAS 2, Article 32(3) — Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic signatures
By 21 May 2025 , the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the validation of qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
This text is not written by an AI. It is rendered from a corpus built from the official EUR-Lex source, where every fragment is content-hashed and signed at ingestion — which is what lets you cite it and defend the citation. Ask a question about this article →
Other articles of the eIDAS 2
Art. 1Art. 2Art. 3Art. 4Art. 5Art. 5aArt. 5bArt. 5cArt. 5dArt. 5eArt. 5fArt. 6Art. 7Art. 8Art. 9Art. 10Art. 11Art. 11aArt. 12Art. 12aArt. 12bArt. 13Art. 14Art. 15Art. 16Art. 17Art. 18Art. 19Art. 19aArt. 20Art. 21Art. 22Art. 23Art. 24Art. 24aArt. 25Art. 26Art. 27Art. 28Art. 29Art. 29aArt. 30Art. 31Art. 32Art. 32aArt. 33Art. 34Art. 35Art. 36Art. 37Art. 38Art. 39Art. 39aArt. 40Art. 40aArt. 41Art. 42Art. 43Art. 44Art. 45Art. 45aArt. 45bArt. 45cArt. 45dArt. 45eArt. 45fArt. 45gArt. 45hArt. 45iArt. 45jArt. 45kArt. 45lArt. 46Art. 46aArt. 46bArt. 46cArt. 46dArt. 46eArt. 47Art. 48Art. 48aArt. 49Art. 50Art. 51Art. 52
Acquis returns official sources verbatim with citations; it is not legal advice. Texts © European Union, reuse permitted (Decision 2011/833/EU) — only the EUR-Lex original is authentic. Why legal AI fails · Coverage